John Locke's Philosophy and Its Enduring Influence on American Democracy

 John Locke's Philosophy and Its Enduring Influence on American Democracy

Introduction

John Locke (1632-1704) stands as one of the most influential political philosophers in Western thought, whose ideas fundamentally shaped the intellectual foundations of modern democratic society. His revolutionary concepts regarding religious tolerance, the social contract, natural rights, and education provided the theoretical framework that would later inspire the American founders in crafting the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. This essay examines Locke's core philosophical contributions across three domains—religion, politics, and education—traces their profound influence on American founding documents, and explores their continued relevance in contemporary political discourse while contrasting them with alternative philosophical traditions, particularly those of Thomas Hobbes.

Locke's Philosophical Framework

Religious Toleration and the Separation of Church and State

Locke's "Letter Concerning Toleration" (1689) presented a radical departure from the religious orthodoxy of his time. Writing in an era marked by religious wars and persecution, Locke argued that civil government has no legitimate authority over matters of religious belief and practice. He distinguished between the temporal concerns of government—maintaining peace, protecting property, and preserving life—and the spiritual concerns of religion, which deal with salvation and the afterlife.

Central to Locke's argument was the principle that religious belief cannot be coerced. True faith, he contended, must be voluntary and sincere; therefore, any attempt by the state to compel religious conformity is not only tyrannical but also counterproductive to genuine religious experience. This insight led him to advocate for what would later become known as the separation of church and state, a principle that would prove foundational to American constitutional thought.

However, Locke's toleration had limits. He excluded Catholics (whom he viewed as owing allegiance to a foreign power) and atheists (whom he believed could not be trusted to keep oaths) from his scheme of tolerance. Despite these restrictions, his work established the philosophical groundwork for broader religious freedom that would eventually transcend his own limitations.

Political Philosophy: Natural Rights and the Social Contract

Locke's political theory, articulated primarily in his "Two Treatises of Government" (1690), fundamentally challenged the divine right of kings and absolute monarchy. He began with the concept of the state of nature, where individuals exist in a condition of natural freedom and equality, governed by natural law discoverable through reason. Unlike Hobbes's pessimistic view of the state of nature as a "war of all against all," Locke envisioned it as generally peaceful, though inconvenient due to the lack of impartial judges and enforcement mechanisms.

In this natural state, Locke argued, individuals possess inherent natural rights to life, liberty, and property. These rights are not granted by government but exist prior to and independent of political society. The right to property, in particular, stems from the principle that individuals own their own labor and therefore acquire property rights in whatever they mix their labor with, provided they leave "enough and as good" for others.

Government, according to Locke, arises through a social contract whereby individuals consent to surrender some of their natural freedom in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights. Crucially, this contract creates only a limited government whose authority derives from the consent of the governed. When government fails to protect natural rights or exceeds its legitimate authority, the people retain the right to alter or abolish it—a concept that would prove revolutionary in its implications.

Locke's theory of government emphasized the separation of powers, distinguishing between legislative, executive, and federative (foreign relations) functions. He viewed the legislative power as supreme but still limited by natural law and the purposes for which government was established. This framework provided both a justification for resistance to tyranny and a blueprint for constitutional government.

Educational Philosophy: The Formation of Mind and Character

Locke's "Some Thoughts Concerning Education" (1693) reflected his broader philosophical commitment to the power of reason and experience in shaping human understanding. Rejecting the notion of innate ideas, Locke viewed the human mind as a "blank slate" (tabula rasa) upon which experience writes. This perspective placed enormous importance on education as the primary means of developing rational, virtuous citizens.

Locke advocated for an education that balanced intellectual development with moral formation and practical skills. He emphasized the importance of cultivating reason, virtue, and good breeding in students, arguing that education should prepare individuals not merely for scholarly pursuits but for effective participation in society. His approach was notably progressive for its time, advocating for learning through experience and play rather than harsh discipline and rote memorization.

The political implications of Locke's educational philosophy were significant. If government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed, then citizens must be capable of rational deliberation about public affairs. Education thus becomes essential to the functioning of democratic society, preparing individuals to exercise their rights and responsibilities as citizens.

Influence on American Founding Documents

The Declaration of Independence

The influence of Locke's political philosophy on the Declaration of Independence is unmistakable and profound. Thomas Jefferson, the document's primary author, drew heavily on Locke's ideas about natural rights, consent of the governed, and the right of revolution. The Declaration's famous assertion that "all men are created equal" and "are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" directly reflects Locke's theory of natural rights.

The Declaration's catalog of grievances against King George III can be understood as an application of Locke's criteria for legitimate resistance to government. By demonstrating that the British government had violated the fundamental rights of the colonists and exceeded its legitimate authority, the founders provided a Lockean justification for revolution. The document's conclusion that governments derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed" and that people have the right "to alter or to abolish" governments that become destructive of their ends represents a direct application of Locke's social contract theory.

However, the founders also modified and extended Locke's ideas. While Locke had written of "life, liberty, and property," Jefferson substituted "the pursuit of happiness" for property, perhaps reflecting a broader conception of human flourishing that encompasses but transcends material concerns.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights

The Constitution reflects Locke's influence in its fundamental structure and principles, though filtered through the founders' own experiences and theoretical developments. The document's creation of a limited government with enumerated powers, its system of checks and balances, and its provision for amendment all reflect Lockean principles of constitutional government.

The Bill of Rights demonstrates even more direct influence from Locke's ideas about religious toleration and individual rights. The First Amendment's protection of religious freedom, though broader than Locke's own conception of toleration, clearly builds upon his arguments for separating civil and religious authority. The amendment's protection of speech, press, assembly, and petition reflects Locke's broader commitment to the rights necessary for democratic participation.

Other amendments in the Bill of Rights protect various aspects of the natural rights Locke had identified. The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures guards property rights, while the Fifth Amendment's due process clause ensures that government cannot deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without proper legal procedures.

The Federalist Papers: Philosophical Foundations in Practice

The Federalist Papers (1787-1788), written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius," provide perhaps the most sophisticated application of Lockean political philosophy to the practical challenges of constitutional design. These 85 essays, written to defend the proposed Constitution during the ratification debates, demonstrate how the founders translated abstract philosophical principles into concrete institutional arrangements while grappling with problems that Locke's theory had not fully anticipated.

The Federalist authors explicitly acknowledged their debt to Locke and other Enlightenment thinkers, but they also recognized that pure Lockean theory required modification to address the realities of governing a large, diverse republic. Madison, in particular, drew heavily on Locke's insights about the separation of powers and the protection of individual rights while developing new theoretical frameworks to address challenges that earlier political philosophy had not adequately addressed.

Federalist 10 and the Problem of Faction

Madison's Federalist 10 represents one of the most important developments of Lockean political theory, addressing what he called "the violence of faction"—the tendency of democratic governments to be captured by narrow interests that pursue their own advantage at the expense of the common good. While Locke had emphasized the importance of majority rule and consent of the governed, Madison recognized that majorities could themselves become tyrannical, threatening the very individual rights that government was supposed to protect.

Madison's solution—an extended republic with a diversity of interests that would make it difficult for any single faction to gain control—represented a creative application of Lockean principles to new circumstances. By arguing that a large republic would be more stable and protective of rights than a small one, Madison challenged conventional wisdom while remaining faithful to Locke's fundamental commitment to protecting individual liberty through constitutional government.

The concept of faction also reflected Lockean assumptions about human nature and the sources of political conflict. Like Locke, Madison viewed the diversity of human faculties and interests as natural and inevitable, but unlike Locke, he developed institutional mechanisms specifically designed to channel this diversity in constructive directions rather than simply hoping that rational deliberation would produce consensus.

Federalist 51 and the Separation of Powers

Federalist 51, also written by Madison, provided the most systematic defense of the Constitution's system of checks and balances, drawing explicitly on Locke's insights about the separation of powers while extending them in new directions. Madison's famous observation that "ambition must be made to counteract ambition" reflected a more realistic assessment of human nature than Locke's sometimes optimistic assumptions about rational cooperation.

The essay's argument that the structure of government must provide "the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department" built directly on Locke's warning that concentrating legislative and executive power in the same hands leads to tyranny. However, Madison's system was more complex than Locke's relatively simple distinction between legislative, executive, and federative powers, incorporating additional checks such as bicameralism, federalism, and judicial review.

Madison's defense of compound government—dividing power not only among branches but also between federal and state levels—represented an innovation that went beyond Locke's framework while serving Lockean ends. This system of "double security" was designed to protect individual rights by ensuring that no single level or branch of government could accumulate enough power to threaten liberty.

Federalist 78 and Judicial Review

Hamilton's Federalist 78 developed the theoretical foundation for judicial review—the power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional—in terms that drew heavily on Lockean principles while addressing a gap in Locke's original theory. Hamilton argued that the judiciary would serve as "the bulwark of a limited constitution against legislative encroachments," protecting individual rights and constitutional limits on government power.

This argument reflected Locke's insight that government must be limited by law, but it provided a more specific institutional mechanism for enforcing those limits than Locke had envisioned. Hamilton's contention that the Constitution represents the will of the people and therefore takes precedence over ordinary legislation echoed Locke's emphasis on consent of the governed while adapting it to the practical challenges of constitutional government.

The defense of judicial independence—with judges serving during good behavior and receiving guaranteed salaries—reflected Lockean concerns about preventing the corruption of government institutions while recognizing that protecting rights requires institutional arrangements that can resist popular pressure when necessary.

Integration of Multiple Philosophical Traditions

While deeply influenced by Locke, the Federalist authors also drew on other philosophical traditions, particularly Montesquieu's analysis of the separation of powers and David Hume's insights about the role of interest and faction in politics. This synthetic approach demonstrated how Lockean principles could be combined with other insights to create a more comprehensive framework for constitutional government.

The Federalist Papers' treatment of federalism, for example, drew on classical theories of mixed government and confederations while adapting them to serve Lockean purposes. The authors argued that dividing sovereignty between federal and state governments would provide additional protection for individual rights while enabling effective governance of a large territory—challenges that Locke's focus on unitary sovereign authority had not adequately addressed.

Contemporary Influence and Constitutional Interpretation

The Federalist Papers continue to influence constitutional interpretation and political theory, serving as authoritative explanations of the founders' intentions and the philosophical foundations of American government. Supreme Court decisions regularly cite the Federalist Papers as evidence of the Constitution's original meaning, while political theorists continue to engage with their insights about the relationship between liberty and order in democratic government.

The papers' sophisticated engagement with the tension between majority rule and minority rights remains particularly relevant to contemporary debates about democracy and constitutional government. Their recognition that protecting liberty requires not only limiting government power but also structuring government institutions to prevent the accumulation of power speaks to ongoing concerns about democratic backsliding and institutional design.

Modern Applications and Continuing Relevance

Contemporary Religious Freedom

Locke's insights about religious toleration remain highly relevant in contemporary debates about religious freedom and the proper relationship between church and state. Modern democratic societies continue to grapple with questions about how to balance religious liberty with other important values such as equality and public safety.

In the United States, Supreme Court cases involving religious freedom often implicitly reference Lockean principles. Debates about prayer in schools, religious exemptions from generally applicable laws, and the display of religious symbols in public spaces all touch on fundamental questions about the proper sphere of government authority that Locke first articulated.

However, modern applications must contend with a pluralism that extends far beyond what Locke could have imagined. Contemporary societies include not only multiple Christian denominations but also numerous world religions and growing numbers of non-religious individuals. This diversity has required an expansion of Locke's original conception of toleration to encompass a broader range of beliefs and practices.

Political Rights and Democratic Participation

Locke's emphasis on consent of the governed and the right to resistance continues to influence contemporary democratic theory and practice. Modern debates about voting rights, campaign finance, and political representation often invoke principles that trace back to Locke's social contract theory.

The civil rights movement of the 1960s, for example, drew explicitly on Lockean principles in arguing that laws denying equal rights to African Americans violated the fundamental purposes of government and therefore justified resistance. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" echoes Locke's arguments about the duty to resist unjust laws that violate natural rights.

Contemporary discussions about democracy and authoritarianism worldwide often reference Lockean principles about the legitimacy of government and the rights of people to alter or abolish governments that fail to serve their proper purposes. The concept of "color revolutions" and democratic movements in various countries can be understood as applications of Lockean theory to contemporary circumstances.

Educational Philosophy and Civic Formation

Locke's insights about education remain relevant to contemporary debates about the purposes and methods of education in democratic societies. His emphasis on developing rational, virtuous citizens capable of democratic participation continues to influence discussions about civic education and the role of schools in preparing students for citizenship.

Modern debates about standardized testing, charter schools, and educational choice often invoke different aspects of Lockean educational philosophy. His emphasis on tailoring education to individual needs and circumstances resonates with contemporary movements for personalized learning, while his concern with moral formation speaks to ongoing debates about character education and values in schools.

The rise of digital technology and social media has created new challenges for civic education that build upon Lockean foundations. If citizens are to exercise informed consent in democratic government, they must be capable of critically evaluating information and engaging in rational discourse about public affairs. This requires educational approaches that develop not only knowledge but also the intellectual virtues necessary for democratic participation.

Comparison with Alternative Philosophical Traditions

Hobbes and the Question of Human Nature

The contrast between Locke and Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) illuminates fundamental disagreements about human nature and the purposes of government that continue to influence political thought. While both philosophers employed social contract theory, their different assumptions about the state of nature led to dramatically different conclusions about the proper scope and limits of government authority.

Hobbes's "Leviathan" (1651) presented a pessimistic view of human nature, arguing that in the state of nature, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." This condition of perpetual conflict, driven by competition, diffidence, and glory, makes the establishment of absolute sovereign authority necessary to maintain peace and security. For Hobbes, the social contract involves a complete surrender of natural rights (except the right to self-preservation) to an absolute sovereign who cannot be resisted or removed.

Locke's more optimistic assessment of human nature and the state of nature led him to different conclusions about government. While acknowledging that inconveniences exist in the state of nature, Locke denied that it necessarily involves constant warfare. His distinction between the state of nature and the state of war allowed him to argue for limited government that protects rather than replaces natural rights.

These different starting points continue to influence contemporary political debates. Those who emphasize the need for strong government authority to maintain order and security often echo Hobbesian themes, while those who prioritize individual rights and limited government tend to draw on Lockean traditions.

Rousseau and Democratic Participation

Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) offered another alternative to Locke's political philosophy that emphasized direct democratic participation and the general will. While Rousseau shared Locke's concern with legitimate government based on consent, his "Social Contract" (1762) argued for a more participatory form of democracy in which citizens directly participate in making laws rather than merely consenting to representatives.

Rousseau's concept of the general will—the collective wisdom of the people when they deliberate about the common good—provided a different foundation for democratic legitimacy than Locke's emphasis on protecting individual rights. This tradition has influenced various forms of participatory democracy and communitarianism that emphasize collective deliberation and shared values over individual rights.

The tension between Lockean liberalism and Rousseauian democracy continues to manifest in contemporary political debates about the proper balance between individual rights and majority rule, the role of direct democracy versus representative government, and the importance of community versus individual autonomy.

Tocqueville's Empirical Assessment: Democracy in Practice

Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" (1835-1840) provides a unique empirical perspective on how Lockean principles functioned in practice during the early decades of American democracy. As a French aristocrat observing American society in the 1830s, Tocqueville offered both an outsider's analytical distance and a deep appreciation for the democratic experiment that had emerged from Lockean foundations.

Tocqueville's observations largely confirmed many of Locke's insights while also revealing tensions and challenges that pure theory had not fully anticipated. He praised the American system's success in protecting individual liberty while maintaining social order, noting how the combination of local self-government, voluntary associations, and religious institutions created what he termed "the art of being free." This achievement seemed to validate Locke's optimistic assessment that rational individuals could successfully govern themselves through consensual institutions.

However, Tocqueville also identified a fundamental tension between equality and liberty that Locke had not fully explored. While Locke emphasized natural equality primarily as a foundation for equal rights, Tocqueville observed that Americans pursued equality of conditions with an intensity that sometimes threatened individual excellence and liberty. He worried about the "tyranny of the majority," where democratic majorities might oppress minorities not through governmental coercion but through social pressure and conformity—a concern that extended beyond Locke's focus on protecting minorities from governmental tyranny.

Tocqueville's analysis of American individualism both reflected and challenged Lockean assumptions. He admired Americans' self-reliance and initiative, which seemed to embody Locke's vision of rational individuals pursuing their interests. Yet he worried that excessive individualism might lead to civic disengagement and ultimately undermine the very democratic institutions that protected individual rights. This tension between individual autonomy and civic participation highlighted questions about the social preconditions for Lockean liberalism that Locke himself had not fully addressed.

Modern Challenges: Rawls and Justice

John Rawls's "A Theory of Justice" (1971) can be understood as a sophisticated updating of Lockean social contract theory for contemporary circumstances. Rawls's original position, in which individuals choose principles of justice from behind a "veil of ignorance" that prevents them from knowing their particular circumstances, echoes Locke's appeal to natural equality and rational consent.

However, Rawls departed from Locke in important ways, particularly in his difference principle, which holds that inequalities are justified only if they benefit the least advantaged members of society. This principle reflects concerns about distributive justice that were less central to Locke's thinking, which focused primarily on protecting existing property rights rather than ensuring fair distribution of goods.

The debate between Rawlsian liberalism and various alternatives—including libertarian theories that hew more closely to Locke's emphasis on property rights and communitarian theories that emphasize shared values and community—illustrates the continuing vitality of questions that Locke first raised about the relationship between individual rights and collective good.

Contemporary Challenges and Limitations

Exclusions and Universality

One of the most significant challenges to Locke's philosophy from a contemporary perspective concerns the exclusions built into his original framework. His theories of natural rights and consent of the governed were formulated within a context that excluded women, enslaved people, indigenous populations, and the poor from full political participation.

While Locke's principles have proved capable of extension beyond their original applications—as demonstrated by movements for women's suffrage, civil rights, and global human rights—this expansion has required acknowledging and correcting the limitations of his original formulations. Contemporary applications of Lockean principles must grapple with questions about how to ensure genuine equality and inclusion that were not adequately addressed in his original works.

Economic Inequality and Property Rights

Locke's theory of property, while influential, faces significant challenges in contemporary societies marked by extreme economic inequality. His argument that individuals acquire property rights through mixing their labor with natural resources assumes conditions of relative abundance that may not obtain in modern circumstances.

Contemporary debates about wealth inequality, taxation, and redistribution often invoke different interpretations of Lockean property theory. Some argue that current distributions of wealth reflect the legitimate exercise of property rights that government should protect, while others contend that extreme inequality undermines the very conditions of freedom and equality that Locke sought to establish.

Technology and Privacy

The digital age has created new challenges for applying Lockean principles about government authority and individual rights. Questions about government surveillance, data privacy, and the power of technology companies raise issues about the protection of liberty that Locke could not have anticipated but that build upon his foundational insights about limiting government power and protecting individual autonomy.

The challenge of regulating global technology platforms while preserving freedom of expression and communication illustrates the continuing relevance of Lockean concerns about the proper scope of government authority, even in contexts he could not have imagined.

Conclusion

John Locke's philosophical contributions to our understanding of religious freedom, political authority, and education continue to provide essential foundations for democratic society more than three centuries after they were first articulated. His insights about natural rights, consent of the governed, and the limits of government authority not only inspired the American founders in creating the Declaration of Independence and Constitution but remain relevant to contemporary challenges facing democratic societies worldwide.

The enduring influence of Locke's ideas demonstrates both their fundamental importance and their capacity for development and application in new circumstances. While his original formulations contained limitations that subsequent generations have had to address and correct, the core principles he established—human equality, individual rights, limited government, and the rule of law—continue to provide essential guides for political thought and practice.

The contrast between Locke's political philosophy and alternatives such as those offered by Hobbes, Rousseau, and contemporary theorists illuminates ongoing tensions within democratic theory about the relationship between individual rights and collective authority, the proper scope of government power, and the requirements of justice in complex modern societies.

As contemporary democratic societies face new challenges from authoritarianism, technological change, economic inequality, and global interconnection, Locke's insights about the foundations of legitimate government and the requirements of human freedom remain as relevant as ever. His work reminds us that political authority must ultimately rest on the consent of free and equal individuals and that the primary purpose of government is to protect and promote human flourishing.

The task for each generation is to apply these fundamental insights to the particular challenges of their time, expanding and deepening our understanding of what it means to create societies that respect human dignity and promote the common good. In this ongoing project, Locke's philosophical legacy continues to provide both inspiration and guidance for the work of building and maintaining free societies.

Sources

Primary Sources

Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration. 1689. Available at: https://www.constitution.org/1-Constitution/liberty/toleration.htm

Locke, John. Some Thoughts Concerning Education. 1693. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5427

Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. 1690. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7370

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. 1651. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3207

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. 1762. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46333

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. 1835-1840. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/815

The Declaration of Independence. 1776. National Archives. Available at: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

The Constitution of the United States. 1787. National Archives. Available at: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. 1787-1788. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers

Secondary Sources

Ashcraft, Richard. Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Dworetz, Steven M. The Unvarnished Doctrine: Locke, Liberalism, and the American Revolution. Durham: Duke University Press, 1990.

Epstein, David F. The Political Theory of the Federalist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

Goldie, Mark. Locke: Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Grant, Ruth W. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Kesler, Charles R., ed. Saving the Revolution: The Federalist Papers and the American Founding. New York: Free Press, 1987.

Laslett, Peter. "Introduction." In Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Marshall, John. John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Pangle, Thomas L. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

Pierson, George Wilson. Tocqueville and Beaumont in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Schleifer, James T. The Making of Tocqueville's Democracy in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.

Simmons, A. John. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

Tarcov, Nathan. Locke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

Tocqueville, Alexis de. The Old Regime and the Revolution. Translated by Stuart Gilbert. Garden City: Doubleday, 1955.

Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Yolton, John W. John Locke and the Way of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956.

Digital Resources

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "John Locke." Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "John Locke." Available at: https://iep.utm.edu/locke/

The Locke Studies Annual Conference. Available at: https://www.lockestudies.org/

John Locke Foundation. Available at: https://www.johnlocke.org/

Library of Congress. "John Locke Collection." Available at: https://www.loc.gov/collections/

Journal Articles

Colman, John. "Locke's Empiricist Theory of the Law of Nature." Journal of the History of Ideas 51, no. 4 (1990): 561-594.

Cooke, Jacob E. "The Federalist Papers: A Critical Analysis." The William and Mary Quarterly 26, no. 2 (1969): 263-284.

Cranston, Maurice. "John Locke and the Case for Toleration." Journal of the History of Ideas 37, no. 2 (1976): 143-146.

Horwitz, Robert H. "John Locke and the Preservation of Liberty: A Perennial Problem of Civic Education." The Review of Politics 41, no. 3 (1979): 312-332.

Mehta, Uday Singh. "Liberal Strategies of Exclusion." Politics and Society 18, no. 4 (1990): 427-454.

Mitchell, Joshua. "Tocqueville on Democratic Religious Experience." The Review of Politics 53, no. 4 (1991): 703-726.

Tuckness, Alex. "The Coherence of a Mind: John Locke and the Law of Nature." Journal of the History of Philosophy 37, no. 1 (1999): 73-90.