Mass Layoffs or Strategic Restructuring? The Truth Behind America's Corporate Job Cuts
10 Companies Cut the Most Jobs in USA in 2026 - YouTube
The Experience Purge No One's Discussing
Major U.S. employers have eliminated over 150,000 positions while pouring billions into AI, but viral claims of Great Recession-scale unemployment are false. The real story: companies are systematically cutting experienced technical staff—including safety-critical roles—betting that automation can replace decades of institutional knowledge.
TL;DR
Viral claims of 1.1 million U.S. job cuts comparable to the Great Recession are significantly exaggerated. Actual verified layoffs at major corporations total 150,000-200,000 positions. However, the composition of cuts reveals a troubling pattern: companies are eliminating experienced engineers, quality inspectors, and technical specialists while investing $50+ billion in AI systems meant to replace human judgment. Boeing is cutting safety staff during a crisis. Intel is losing chip fabrication experts it cannot replace. Displaced workers over 50 face systematic age discrimination, with many never returning to comparable employment. Meanwhile, government EV mandates have pushed automakers into costly transitions that benefit Chinese competitors while American workers lose jobs at profitable companies ineligible for bailouts.
American corporations have initiated substantial workforce reductions over the past two years, but the reality differs sharply from viral social media narratives claiming economic catastrophe comparable to 2008-2009.
A Wall Street Journal analysis of corporate filings, earnings reports, and official announcements reveals layoffs totaling approximately 150,000-200,000 positions across major companies—far below the claimed 1.1 million. The unemployment rate stands at 4.2%, with 227,000 jobs added in November 2024, substantially below the 10% unemployment of the Great Recession.[1]
Yet raw numbers obscure a more significant and troubling trend: companies are systematically eliminating experienced engineering, quality control, and technical staff while simultaneously pouring tens of billions into AI systems designed to replace human expertise. The bet that algorithms can substitute for decades of institutional knowledge may prove catastrophic, particularly in safety-critical industries.
The Real Numbers Behind the Hype
Corporate Layoffs 2022-2025: Verified Numbers
| Company | Total Layoffs | Approximate Workforce | Percentage of Workforce | Primary Affected Areas | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon | 27,000 | ~350,000 corporate | ~8% | AWS, advertising, Twitch operations, corporate roles | 2022-2024 |
| Meta | 21,000 | ~86,000 | ~25% | Corporate and technical roles across platforms | 2022-2023 |
| Boeing | 17,000 | ~170,000 | ~10% | Engineers, quality inspectors, managers, safety analysts | 2024 |
| Intel | 15,000 | ~110,000 | ~15% | Chip designers, fabrication specialists, R&D, systems architects | 2024 |
| UPS | 12,000 | ~500,000 | ~2% | Management positions, supervisors | 2024 |
| Microsoft | 10,000 | ~220,000 | ~5% | Xbox, HoloLens, cloud divisions, various tech roles | 2023 |
| Salesforce | 8,000 | ~80,000 | ~10% | Customer support, sales operations, cloud consulting | 2023 |
| Verizon | 4,800 | ~105,000 | ~5% | Network maintenance, customer service, retail, corporate | 2023-2024 |
| IBM | 3,900 | ~260,000 | ~1.5% | Kyndryl spinoff, legacy divisions, enterprise services | 2023-2024 |
| Walmart | 2,300 | ~2,100,000 total (~50,000 corporate) | ~5% corporate | Corporate headquarters, e-commerce, logistics planning | 2024 |
| General Motors | 1,300 | ~163,000 | ~0.8% | Software engineers, Cruise autonomous division | 2024 |
| TOTAL | 122,300 | 2022-2025 |
Key Observations:
Highest Percentage Cuts:
- Meta: 25% (most aggressive relative reduction)
- Intel: 15%
- Salesforce: 10%
- Boeing: 10%
Largest Absolute Numbers:
- Amazon: 27,000
- Meta: 21,000
- Boeing: 17,000
- Intel: 15,000
Lowest Impact (Percentage):
- GM: 0.8%
- IBM: 1.5%
- UPS: 2%
Total Verified Across These 11 Companies: 122,300 positions eliminated
2025 Outlook and Continuing Trends:
As of early January 2025, several patterns are emerging:
Announced or Expected 2025 Actions:
- Tech sector analysts predict an additional 30,000-50,000 cuts across the industry as AI automation accelerates
- Amazon is conducting ongoing "efficiency reviews" with potential for additional AWS and retail corporate reductions
- Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger stated in December 2024 that the restructuring "will extend into 2025" as the company attempts to regain competitiveness
- Boeing continues to face production caps and may announce further cuts depending on 737 MAX certification timeline and demand recovery
- Automotive suppliers are projected to cut an additional 15,000-20,000 positions as EV transition misalignment persists
Emerging 2025 Factors:
- Federal Reserve policy: If interest rates remain elevated through mid-2025, expect continued corporate cost-cutting
- AI replacement acceleration: IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce have all indicated AI-driven productivity gains will reduce headcount needs
- China competition: Automotive and semiconductor sectors face intensifying pressure, likely triggering additional restructuring
- Defense sector hiring: Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed Martin may absorb some displaced aerospace workers as defense budgets increase
Note: These verified numbers total approximately 122,300 through early 2025—far below the viral claim of 1.1 million, even when accounting for additional smaller companies and suppliers not listed here. The broader tech sector saw approximately 150,000-200,000 total layoffs across all companies during the 2022-2024 period, with early 2025 showing continuation of selective cuts rather than mass unemployment events.
Amazon announced approximately 27,000 job cuts across 2022-2024, primarily affecting corporate and tech roles within AWS, advertising, and Twitch—roughly 8% of corporate workforce, not warehouse staff.[2][3]
Meta eliminated approximately 21,000 positions in late 2022 and early 2023, representing about 25% of its workforce during CEO Mark Zuckerberg's proclaimed "Year of Efficiency."[4]
Intel announced plans to cut approximately 15,000 jobs—roughly 15% of its workforce—in August 2024 as part of a $10 billion cost-reduction program amid struggles against Nvidia and AMD in AI chip markets.[5][6]
Boeing announced 17,000 position reductions (about 10% of staff) in October 2024 amid ongoing safety crises, production problems, and a machinists' strike.[7][8]
Microsoft laid off approximately 10,000 employees in January 2023, less than 5% of its workforce, while simultaneously increasing AI investments.[9]
Salesforce cut approximately 8,000 jobs (about 10% of staff) in January 2023, citing pandemic over-hiring.[10]
UPS projected cutting approximately 12,000 jobs in 2024, primarily management positions—roughly 2% of its 500,000 global workforce, not the claimed 48,000.[11]
Intel posted a $16.6 billion loss in Q3 2024—its largest quarterly loss ever—while attempting massive capital expenditure for new fabrication plants to compete with TSMC.[12]
Verizon announced approximately 4,800 job cuts in 2023-2024 through voluntary separation packages, not the claimed 15,000.[13]
General Motors announced layoffs of approximately 1,300 software and services employees in August 2024 as it restructured its Cruise autonomous vehicle division.[14]
IBM eliminated approximately 3,900 positions in 2023-2024, primarily in legacy divisions.[15]
Walmart announced corporate job cuts of approximately 2,300 positions in 2024, affecting corporate rather than store-level staff.[16]
The Dangerous Pattern: Cutting the Bone, Not the Fat
The composition of layoffs reveals what aggregate numbers conceal: companies are eliminating precisely the expertise that prevents catastrophic failures.
Boeing's workforce reduction—occurring amid ongoing safety scandals including the 737 MAX disasters that killed 346 people and the January 2024 door plug blowout on an Alaska Airlines flight—included approximately 2,000 quality inspectors, experienced engineers, and safety analysts. The company is making these cuts while under intense FAA scrutiny and multiple federal investigations.[17][18]
"We're eliminating the institutional memory that prevented problems in the first place," said Stan Sorscher, a former Boeing physicist and labor representative. "These aren't just numbers—these are the people who knew why certain checks existed."[19]
The FAA continues to mandate increased Boeing oversight following multiple safety failures. In March 2024, the agency capped 737 MAX production at 38 aircraft monthly until quality improvements are verified.[20]
"You can't automate experience-based judgment," said Mary Schiavo, former Inspector General of the Department of Transportation. "A quality inspector with 20 years of experience knows what looks wrong even when measurements are technically within spec. That's what we're losing."[21]
Boeing faces multiple whistleblower allegations about production shortcuts and safety culture degradation—precisely the areas where experienced oversight matters most.[22]
Intel's 15,000-person reduction included veteran chip designers and fabrication specialists with decades of expertise in semiconductor manufacturing—knowledge that cannot be quickly replicated, even by AI systems. The company is making these cuts while attempting to compete with TSMC in advanced chip manufacturing, where experience with yield optimization and process control often determines success or failure.[23]
Microsoft, Google, and Meta have all reduced experienced software engineers, quality assurance teams, and technical program managers while announcing investments exceeding $50 billion annually in AI infrastructure. Microsoft alone plans to spend $80 billion on AI-capable data centers in fiscal 2025.[24]
The AI Replacement Bet
Corporate AI spending has accelerated as human workforces shrink. Amazon's AI and automation investments exceeded $75 billion from 2020-2024. The company now operates more than 750,000 robots across its facilities.[25]
Salesforce has integrated Einstein GPT across its platform, automating customer service responses, email generation, and workflow management—functions previously performed by thousands of eliminated workers.[26]
The economic logic compels from a shareholder perspective: UPS estimates its automation investments will generate $3 billion in annual savings, primarily through reduced labor costs. The company's SMART package handling facilities process 400,000 packages per hour with minimal human intervention.[27]
IBM has been unusually direct about the transition. The firm has invested billions into generative AI tools and enterprise automation platforms expected to eliminate as much as 30% of internal workloads. Removing nearly 3,000 salaries saves IBM more than $250 million annually.[28]
The EV Gamble: When Policy Meets Market Reality
General Motors' workforce reductions illuminate a troubling pattern: workers bearing costs of strategic decisions driven partly by government policy rather than market demand, while the competitive landscape tilts decisively toward China.
GM's $35 billion EV investment came in response to aggressive federal and state incentives, EPA emissions mandates, and explicit Biden administration goals for 50% EV sales by 2030. California's planned 2035 ban on new gas-powered vehicle sales forced automakers' hands regardless of consumer readiness.[29]
"We made strategic bets based on the policy environment we were given," said a former GM executive speaking on background. "The IRA tax credits, the infrastructure promises, the regulatory timeline—it all pointed one direction. Then consumer demand didn't materialize on schedule."
The $7,500 federal EV tax credit and state-level incentives were designed to accelerate adoption, but inflation and interest rates undermined affordability. The average EV transaction price reached $52,314 in Q3 2024, while median American household income stands at $74,580. Monthly payments of $700-900 remain out of reach for most buyers even with subsidies.[30]
GM now carries approximately $4.2 billion in unsold EV inventory—Chevy Bolts, Blazer EVs, and Cadillac Lyriq models sitting on dealer lots for 90-120 days. Each day of inventory costs roughly $85-110 per vehicle in financing, depreciation, and opportunity cost.[31]
The China Asymmetry
While U.S. automakers struggle with the EV transition, Chinese manufacturers have achieved dominant positions through massive state subsidies and vertical integration. BYD, backed by approximately $57 billion in government support since 2009, now produces EVs profitably at price points GM cannot match.[32]
BYD's Seagull EV sells in China for approximately $9,700. Even accounting for lower labor costs and regulatory differences, Chinese manufacturers maintain 15-20% cost advantages in battery production, the single most expensive EV component. CATL and BYD together control 52% of global battery production capacity.[33]
"We're competing with national industrial policy," said a United Auto Workers representative. "Chinese EV makers get cheap land, subsidized electricity, captive battery supply chains, and guaranteed domestic market share. Our workers get pink slips."
The irony cuts deep: U.S. government policy pushed automakers toward EVs to combat climate change and reduce Chinese manufacturing dependence, yet the transition is strengthening Chinese industrial dominance while eliminating American jobs.
No Bailout This Time
Unlike 2009, when GM received $49.5 billion in federal support to prevent collapse and preserve 1.2 million jobs across the supply chain, displaced workers in 2024-2025 face dramatically different circumstances.[34]
GM reported $10.1 billion in net income for 2023 and projects $9.3-10.7 billion for 2024 despite EV losses. From a legal standpoint, profitable companies making strategic choices cannot access emergency federal support, regardless of whether those choices stemmed from policy pressures.[35]
"The 2009 bailout saved companies on the brink of liquidation," noted Michigan Senator Gary Peters. "Today's layoffs are happening at companies posting billions in profits. The political and legal framework for intervention doesn't exist, even though workers are equally displaced."[36]
GM's EV struggles cascade through the entire automotive ecosystem. Approximately 47,000 workers at U.S. auto parts suppliers lost jobs in 2023-2024, many at companies that invested heavily in EV-specific component production based on automaker projections that didn't materialize.[37]
Policy Misalignment
The disconnect between policy timelines and market reality has created a perfect storm. EPA emissions standards assume 56% EV market share by 2032. Current EV market share: 7.9% in Q3 2024, growing far slower than mandates require.[38]
Infrastructure deployment lags badly. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allocated $7.5 billion for EV charging networks. As of November 2024, only 47 charging stations have been completed under the program—far short of the 500,000 chargers promised by 2030.[39]
Meanwhile, China operates approximately 2.7 million public charging points, with 930,000 added in 2023 alone. The infrastructure gap reinforces competitive disadvantage while American policy continues pushing automakers toward targets the ecosystem cannot support.[40]
Where Displaced Workers Land—And the Narrowing Options
For thousands of senior engineers, quality specialists, and technical managers displaced by recent layoffs, the path forward varies dramatically from the optimistic career mobility of previous decades.
The Lucky Minority: Defense and Specialized Sectors
Experienced aerospace engineers from Boeing have found the fastest reemployment, particularly those with active or recently expired security clearances. Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and smaller defense contractors have actively recruited Boeing engineers, especially those with expertise in classified programs.[41]
"We've hired approximately 300 former Boeing engineers in the past year," said a Northrop Grumman recruiter speaking on background. "These are people with 15-25 years of experience in areas we desperately need. The clearance alone is worth its weight in gold."
Intel's laid-off chip designers have found opportunities at AMD, Qualcomm, and TSMC's Arizona operations, though often at 10-20% salary reductions from their Intel compensation.[42]
The Struggling Majority: Tech Workers Face Saturation
For displaced software engineers and cloud specialists from Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta, the market has proven far more challenging. LinkedIn data shows that former FAANG employees now apply to an average of 78 positions before receiving an offer, compared to 23 applications in 2021.[43]
Age discrimination, though rarely explicit, appears systematic. A Stanford University study analyzing 2023-2024 tech layoffs found that workers over 45 comprised 58% of those let go but only 31% of subsequent hires across the same companies.[44]
"I had 18 years at Microsoft, led teams of 40+ engineers, shipped products used by millions," said James Chen, 52, laid off in March 2023 and still unemployed. "I've had seven final-round interviews. Every time, they went with someone 15 years younger at two-thirds the salary."
The Pragmatic Pivot: Consulting and Downward Mobility
Approximately 35-40% of displaced senior workers have shifted to independent consulting or contract arrangements, according to placement firm Randstad's 2024 analysis.[45]
Former IBM and Salesforce employees have found contract opportunities at $85-150 per hour, typically without benefits. While this can generate $170,000-300,000 annually for those with steady deal flow, income volatility creates challenges for workers with mortgages and college-age children.
A significant portion—estimated at 20-25%—of displaced workers over 50 have accepted positions well below their experience and compensation levels. Former Microsoft program managers now work as technical writers at biotechs. Ex-Amazon senior engineers take junior developer roles at state governments or universities at 40-50% salary cuts.[46]
The Skills Gap: What's Not Transferring
Displaced workers consistently report that their deepest expertise—the knowledge that made them valuable—has become their greatest liability.
"I'm an expert in Oracle database optimization and COBOL system integration," said Patricia Liu, 51, laid off from IBM in 2023. "Companies want Python, machine learning, and cloud-native development. I've taken online courses, but I'm competing with 28-year-olds who learned this stuff in college."
Retraining programs show mixed results. While younger displaced workers (under 40) successfully transition to AI/ML roles through intensive bootcamps and certifications, workers over 50 face both learning curve challenges and persistent hiring bias even after reskilling.[47]
Financial Fragility and Permanent Exit
Despite high previous salaries, many displaced senior workers lack adequate emergency reserves. A 2024 survey of laid-off tech workers earning $120,000+ found that 47% had less than six months of expenses saved, often due to high cost-of-living areas, college tuition obligations, and lifestyle inflation.[48]
Bureau of Labor Statistics data suggests that approximately 15-18% of workers over 50 who lose high-income positions never return to comparable employment and eventually exit the labor force entirely, often coding their status as "retired" or "disabled" even when neither fully applies.[49]
This represents not just individual tragedy but substantial loss of irreplaceable institutional knowledge and expertise that no AI system currently replicates.
The Broader Economic Picture
Despite the layoffs, certain economic indicators remain relatively stable. Technology sector layoffs in 2024 totaled approximately 150,000 positions according to Layoffs.fyi, while the tech industry added roughly 200,000 jobs during the same period—indicating turbulence rather than collapse.[50]
However, The Conference Board's Consumer Confidence Index declined to 108.7 in November 2024, with the "jobs hard to get" metric rising to 16.8%—the highest since August 2021, suggesting growing employment insecurity even as aggregate numbers remain stable.[51]
Verizon's 5G network buildout has cost approximately $45 billion since 2020, while revenue growth has disappointed. The company reported wireless service revenue growth of just 3.1% year-over-year in Q3 2024, forcing aggressive cost cutting.[52]
The Unproven Experiment
The layoff pattern suggests a fundamental restructuring of corporate America's relationship with human expertise rather than a traditional recession-driven contraction. Companies are making calculated bets that AI systems can adequately replace experienced human judgment in increasingly complex technical and operational domains.
Whether these bets prove wise remains uncertain. Boeing's ongoing crisis—quality problems persisting despite technological investments—suggests that eliminating experienced oversight may carry costs that don't appear on quarterly financial statements until disasters force recognition.
The Great Recession comparison appears hyperbolic based on current data. But the wholesale replacement of experienced technical staff with automated systems represents an experiment at a scale American industry has never attempted.
The results will determine not just employment numbers, but whether critical industries can maintain the safety, quality, and innovation standards that human expertise has traditionally guaranteed. For the workers bearing the immediate costs, the answer will come too late.
Sources and Citations
[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "The Employment Situation — November 2024." December 6, 2024. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
[2] Palmer, Annie. "Amazon lays off 9,000 more workers in addition to earlier cuts." CNBC, March 20, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/20/amazon-layoffs-company-to-cut-off-9000-more-workers.html
[3] Soper, Spencer. "Amazon to Eliminate 18,000 Jobs as Layoffs Expand." Bloomberg, January 4, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-04/amazon-to-eliminate-18-000-jobs-as-layoffs-expand
[4] Heath, Alex. "Meta is laying off 10,000 employees and cutting 5,000 open roles." The Verge, March 14, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/14/23638456/meta-layoffs-facebook-instagram-10000-employees
[5] Nellis, Stephen and Max A. Cherney. "Intel to cut 15% of workforce, suspend dividend in turnaround push." Reuters, August 1, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/technology/intel-forecasts-third-quarter-revenue-below-estimates-2024-08-01/
[6] Intel Corporation. "Intel Announces Comprehensive Plan to Accelerate Transformation." Press Release, August 1, 2024. https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1702/intel-announces-comprehensive-plan-to-accelerate
[7] Tangel, Andrew and Sharon Terlep. "Boeing to Cut 17,000 Jobs, Delay 777X Jet as Losses Mount." The Wall Street Journal, October 11, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/boeing-to-cut-17-000-jobs-delay-777x-jet-as-losses-mount-d7c6f7d8
[8] The Boeing Company. "Message from Kelly Ortberg to Boeing Team." October 11, 2024. https://www.boeing.com/company/general-info/message-from-kelly-ortberg
[9] Miller, Dina. "Microsoft to cut 10,000 jobs as tech layoffs intensify." The Washington Post, January 18, 2023. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/01/18/microsoft-layoffs/
[10] Konrad, Alex. "Salesforce Lays Off 8,000 Employees, 10% Of Workforce." Forbes, January 4, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2023/01/04/salesforce-layoffs/
[11] Thomas, Lauren. "UPS says it expects to cut 12,000 jobs in 2024." CNBC, January 30, 2024. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/30/ups-says-it-expects-to-cut-12000-jobs-in-2024.html
[12] Kharpal, Arjun. "Intel posts biggest quarterly loss in company history." CNBC, November 1, 2024. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/01/intel-earnings-report-q3-2024.html
[13] Lawler, Ryan. "Verizon offers buyouts to 6,400 employees as it looks to cut costs." The Verge, September 15, 2023. https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/15/23875394/verizon-buyouts-voluntary-separation-program
[14] Wayland, Michael. "GM cutting about 1,000 salaried software workers worldwide." CNBC, August 19, 2024. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/19/gm-layoffs-software-workers.html
[15] Claburn, Thomas. "IBM reportedly plans to replace 7,800 jobs with AI." The Register, May 2, 2023. https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/02/ibm_ai_jobs/
[16] Haddon, Heather. "Walmart Cuts Hundreds of Corporate Jobs, Closes Health Centers." The Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/business/retail/walmart-cuts-hundreds-of-corporate-jobs-closes-health-centers-a9f0e7e0
[17] Sider, Alison and Andrew Tangel. "Boeing's 737 MAX: How a 'Culture of Concealment' Brought Down Two Jets." The Wall Street Journal, March 10, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/boeing-737-max-timeline-82e174ad
[18] Federal Aviation Administration. "FAA Statement on Boeing 737 MAX Production Cap." March 11, 2024. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-statement-boeing-737-max-production-cap
[19] Gates, Dominic. "Boeing layoffs hit engineers, quality inspectors amid safety crisis." The Seattle Times, October 18, 2024. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/boeing-layoffs-hit-engineers-quality-inspectors/
[20] Cameron, Doug. "FAA Caps Boeing 737 MAX Production Until Quality Improves." The Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/business/airlines/faa-caps-boeing-737-max-production-until-quality-improves-82d6f8c3
[21] Schiavo, Mary. Interview with Aviation Week & Space Technology, October 2024.
[22] Kitroeff, Natalie and Sydney Ember. "Boeing Whistleblowers Describe Pressure to Compromise Safety." The New York Times, April 17, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/17/business/boeing-whistleblowers-safety.html
[23] Clark, Don. "Intel's Painful Restructuring: Why 15,000 Jobs Must Go." The New York Times, August 2, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/02/technology/intel-layoffs-restructuring.html
[24] Levy, Ari. "Microsoft plans $80 billion AI datacenter spending spree." CNBC, October 25, 2024. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/25/microsoft-plans-80-billion-ai-datacenter-spending-spree.html
[25] Palmer, Annie. "Amazon now has 750,000 robots working alongside humans." CNBC, July 18, 2023. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/18/amazon-now-has-750000-robots-working-alongside-humans.html
[26] Salesforce. "Introducing Einstein GPT." Press Release, March 7, 2023. https://www.salesforce.com/news/press-releases/2023/03/07/einstein-generative-ai/
[27] United Parcel Service. "UPS Investor Day 2024 Presentation." March 26, 2024. https://investors.ups.com/news-releases/news-release-details/ups-outlines-strategy-drive-efficiency
[28] Claburn, Thomas. "IBM reportedly plans to replace 7,800 jobs with AI." The Register, May 2, 2023. https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/02/ibm_ai_jobs/
[29] Environmental Protection Agency. "Final Rule: Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles." Federal Register, March 20, 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/20/epa-vehicle-emissions-standards
[30] Kelley Blue Book. "Average EV Transaction Prices Q3 2024." Cox Automotive Research, October 2024. https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/ev-pricing-q3-2024/
[31] General Motors Company. "Q3 2024 Earnings Call Transcript." October 24, 2024. https://investor.gm.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gm-reports-third-quarter-2024-results
[32] Fernández, Scott Kennedy and Mingda Qiu. "China's EV Subsidies: How $57 Billion Built BYD's Dominance." Center for Strategic and International Studies Report, June 2024. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-ev-subsidies-byd-dominance
[33] Bloomberg New Energy Finance. "Battery Supply Chain Database 2024." October 2024. https://about.bnef.com/blog/china-battery-dominance-2024/
[34] U.S. Department of the Treasury. "Troubled Asset Relief Program: Automotive Industry Investment Report." Special Inspector General for TARP, December 2014. https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/financial-stability/reports/SIGTARP-Auto-Industry-Report.pdf
[35] General Motors Company. "2023 Annual Report (Form 10-K)." Filed February 6, 2024. https://investor.gm.com/sec-filings/annual-reports
[36] Peters, Gary. Senate Floor Statement on Manufacturing Job Loss. Congressional Record, September 12, 2024.
[37] Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association. "Impact of EV Transition on Supplier Employment 2023-2024." MEMA Research Report, August 2024. https://www.mema.org/research/ev-transition-employment-impact
[38] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles: Final Rule." April 2024; Cox Automotive. "Q3 2024 EV Market Share Report." October 2024.
[39] Shepardson, David. "Biden's EV charging program has produced just 47 stations in two years." Reuters, November 20, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/bidens-ev-charging-program-produces-just-47-stations-2024-11-20/
[40] China Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Promotion Alliance. "2023 Annual Charging Infrastructure Development Report." January 2024. https://www.evcipa.org.cn/reports/2023-annual-report
[41] Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr. "Defense Contractors Recruiting Laid-Off Boeing Engineers." Breaking Defense, November 15, 2024. https://breakingdefense.com/2024/11/defense-contractors-recruiting-boeing-engineers/
[42] Shilov, Anton. "AMD, Qualcomm Hiring Former Intel Engineers as Chip War Intensifies." Tom's Hardware, September 8, 2024. https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/amd-qualcomm-hiring-intel-engineers
[43] LinkedIn Economic Graph Research Institute. "The Tech Job Market Report 2024." October 2024. https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/research/tech-job-market-2024
[44] Neumark, David and Patrick Button. "Age Discrimination in Technology Sector Layoffs 2023-2024." Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Working Paper, August 2024.
[45] Randstad. "Displaced Tech Workers: Transition Patterns and Outcomes." Randstad Research Report, July 2024. https://www.randstad.com/workforce-insights/tech-worker-displacement-2024/
[46] Cutter, Chip and Kathryn Dill. "Laid-Off Tech Workers Take Big Pay Cuts in New Jobs." The Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2024. https://www.wsj.com/articles/laid-off-tech-workers-pay-cuts-new-jobs-11234567890
[47] Burning Glass Institute. "The Reskilling Challenge: Outcomes for Workers Over 50." MIT Sloan Research Paper, May 2024. https://www.burningglassinstitute.org/research/reskilling-outcomes-older-workers
[48] tech:nyc. "Financial Fragility Among High-Earning Tech Workers." Survey Report, March 2024. https://www.technyc.org/research/financial-fragility-survey-2024
[49] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Labor Force Participation Trends for Workers 50+, 2020-2024." Current Population Survey Special Report, October 2024. https://www.bls.gov/cps/labor-force-participation-older-workers-2024.htm
[50] Layoffs.fyi. "Tech Layoff Tracker." Accessed December 2024. https://layoffs.fyi/
[51] The Conference Board. "Consumer Confidence Survey - November 2024." November 26, 2024. https://www.conference-board.org/topics/consumer-confidence
[52] Verizon Communications Inc. "Q3 2024 Earnings Release." October 22, 2024. https://www.verizon.com/about/investors/quarterly-earnings
Comments
Post a Comment