Paying Top Dollar to Watch It Flow Into the Sea

 Reason. Free Minds  •  Free Markets

Investigative  ·  Water Policy  ·  Fiscal Accountability Infrastructure Government Failure

Special Report  ·  March 2026

How decades of deferred maintenance, regulatory timidity, and bureaucratic buck-passing turned Southern California's water infrastructure into a machine for destroying value — and why a near-disaster on Oahu's North Shore is the most honest picture yet of where this road leads.

Compiled from CalMatters, San Diego Union-Tribune, CBS 8, Voice of San Diego, KPBS, Honolulu Civil Beat, NPR, CNN, ASCE Infrastructure Report Card, DLNR Records, SDCWA Rate Filings, and SEC Documents

March 21, 2026

Bottom Line Up Front

On March 20, 2026, a 120-year-old earthen dam on Oahu came within three feet of catastrophic failure during Hawaii's worst flooding in two decades. The dam's owner, a subsidiary of NYSE-listed Dole plc — an $8.48 billion-revenue Irish-American multinational — had received seventeen years of state deficiency notices, accumulated fines, and watched its parent company pay out $92.4 million in shareholder dividends rather than fund the $21 million in spillway repairs regulators required. The dam is not yet the state's problem because a government acquisition authorized in 2023 has moved at bureaucratic pace toward a hard June 30, 2026 deadline.

Three thousand miles away, San Diego is living the long-running version of the same story. The city owns eleven dams averaging 92 years old. Six are in below-standard condition. Nine carry an "extremely high" downstream hazard rating. Because four have been declared unsafe by state regulators, the city has been forced to dump more than 12 billion gallons of stored rainwater into the Pacific Ocean rather than risk a dam failure. That water — collected, treated, and delivered at rates that are among the highest in the nation — was purchased at roughly $1,389 per acre-foot and poured into the sea. The tab for the discarded water alone exceeds $50 million. Fixing the dams is estimated at $1 billion or more. In 2024, Governor Newsom cut the state's dam repair grant program in half to address a budget shortfall.

The throughline from Oahu to San Diego to Sacramento is not bad luck. It is the entirely predictable result of allowing critical infrastructure to be managed by entities — public and private — that can externalize the costs of neglect onto ratepayers and downstream communities while capturing the benefits. The bill always comes due. The only question is how catastrophically.

The Hawaiian Preview

Shortly after 8:30 on the morning of Friday, March 20, 2026, emergency sirens began sounding along Oahu's North Shore. Phones across Haleiwa and Waialua buzzed with a city alert: the Wahiawa Dam — a 660-foot earthen structure holding nearly three billion gallons of water above the island's most famous stretch of coastline — was at "imminent risk of failure." Residents had minutes to decide whether to leave.

By then, 5,500 people were under evacuation orders. Both main exit roads were already flooding. Rescue crews were pulling people off rooftops. The National Guard had airlifted 72 children and camp counselors from a spring break retreat on the island's west coast. Hawaii Governor Josh Green called it the worst flooding Oahu had seen in twenty years. Early statewide damage estimates exceeded $1 billion.

The dam did not fail. Water levels peaked at 85.3 feet — five feet below the concrete crest, three feet below a portable AquaDam barrier Dole had deployed as a temporary fix — and then, mercifully, began to recede. But the near-miss exposed something that had been clearly visible in the regulatory record for nearly two decades: the Wahiawa Dam was an accident waiting to happen, its owner had been told so repeatedly, and the institutional machinery designed to prevent precisely this outcome had instead produced a seventeen-year performance of documented concern followed by documented inaction.

The economics of that inaction are the story. Dole Food Company Hawaii, the local subsidiary, had received four formal state Notices of Deficiency since 2009. The state classified the dam as presenting "HIGH HAZARD potential" — the official designation meaning failure "will result in probable loss of human life." Its own commissioned study from 2017 was found to have "significant errors" that substantially underestimated the probable maximum flood the reservoir could face. The spillway could handle less than half of the worst-case storm scenario. In 2021, the state fined Dole $20,000 for missing safety deadlines — a figure roughly equivalent to what a competent attorney charges to review the notice. Dan Nellis, the local general manager, told a state board that "the high cost of the spillway modification balanced against Dole Hawai'i's profit margin is concerning." When a board member asked whether Dole even held liability insurance against a dam failure, Nellis replied that he was "not in a position to answer that."

The repair cost: $21 million. What Dole's publicly-traded Irish parent, Dole plc (NYSE: DOLE), paid in shareholder dividends from 2023 to 2026: $92.4 million, per SEC filings. The arithmetic does not require an advanced degree.

The Wahiawa Math: What Was Weighed Against What

·       $21M State-required spillway repair cost — never funded

·       $92.4M Shareholder dividends paid by Dole plc, 2023–2026 (SEC filings)

·       3B Gallons held in Wahiawa Reservoir above 2,492 people

·       $1B+ Governor's early estimate of statewide storm damage

This is the classic structure of externalized risk. The entity that controls the infrastructure captures the benefit of not spending money on maintenance. The people who live downstream bear the risk of the failure that deferred maintenance makes more likely. The regulatory apparatus in between — in this case Hawaii's Department of Land and Natural Resources — has the legal authority to compel repairs but lacks enforcement tools with teeth. A $20,000 fine on a multinational corporation is not a deterrent. It is a rounding error.

Three Thousand Miles West: The San Diego Edition

The Wahiawa situation is acute, dramatic, and mercifully still hypothetical in terms of its worst outcome. The San Diego situation is chronic, diffuse, and already costing ratepayers real money — billions of dollars in costs that flow not from a disaster but from the everyday administrative consequence of allowing public infrastructure to deteriorate past the point where it can safely do its job.

The City of San Diego owns eleven dams. They average 92 years old. Nine of the eleven carry state classifications of "extremely high downstream hazard" — meaning a failure would likely kill people and destroy property on a large scale. Six are rated below standard. The state has placed operating restrictions on four of them, forcing the city to keep water levels far below capacity because the dams cannot safely hold a full reservoir. Lake Hodges Dam, built in 1918 and rated "unsatisfactory" — the lowest possible state classification — has had its water level restricted to 280 feet above sea level since 2023. Below that level, the dam poses an acceptable downstream risk. Above it, state engineers have concluded, it does not.

Here is the consequence of that restriction: every time it rains hard enough to push Lake Hodges above the safety threshold, the city opens the gates and releases the water into the San Dieguito River, which carries it to the Pacific Ocean near Del Mar. The city has released more than 12 billion gallons this way since the restriction was imposed. That is not a typo. Twelve billion gallons — enough to fill roughly 36,000 Olympic swimming pools — released into the ocean because the dam holding it was not maintained to the standard required to keep the water safely behind it.

"From the perspective of our ratepayers, seeing billions of gallons released over the past several years — that's money that's literally going down the drain."

— Teresa Penunuri, Santa Fe Irrigation District, CBS 8, December 2024

What does that water cost? The Santa Fe Irrigation District, which holds water rights at Lake Hodges, quantified it in a lawsuit filed against the city: replacing each acre-foot of lost local water with imported water purchased from the San Diego County Water Authority costs $1,389 per acre-foot as of 2024. Twelve billion gallons is approximately 36,800 acre-feet. At $1,389 per acre-foot, the replacement cost of the discarded water approaches $51 million — and that calculation covers only imported water costs, not the additional treatment and delivery expenses layered on top.

The downstream financial consequences compound. The Lake Hodges Pumped Storage Facility — a $208 million hydroelectric plant that uses the reservoir to generate electricity for 26,000 homes annually — cannot operate when water levels are too low. The San Diego County Water Authority, which operates the facility, reports lost revenues of $3 million per year from non-operation, plus $3 million per year in maintenance costs for a facility generating nothing. That is $6 million annually thrown away because a dam was not maintained.

The two water districts that hold contractual water rights at Lake Hodges have now filed a lawsuit against the City of San Diego, alleging breach of contract and claiming customers have seen up to a 40 percent increase in their water bills due to the lost access. That litigation adds legal costs to the already substantial direct losses.

The Cost Spiral That Nobody Voted For

San Diego ratepayers are not merely paying for water they cannot store. They are simultaneously paying for the infrastructure they overbought in good faith and for the infrastructure they failed to maintain in bad faith — a double fiscal punishment that explains why water bills in San Diego have become a regional emergency in their own right.

San Diego pays more for water than virtually any other major California city. The San Diego County Water Authority charges its member agencies $1,474 per acre-foot for untreated imported water — well above the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California's $1,075 rate paid by Los Angeles-area agencies. A typical San Diego household's monthly water bill rose to roughly $240 by January 2025 and is projected to climb another 61 percent through 2029, adding about $57 per month. The Water Authority approved an 8.3 percent wholesale rate increase for 2026 alone.

The reasons for the premium are not irrational in isolation. The Water Authority spent approximately $3 billion over three decades diversifying away from Los Angeles-controlled Metropolitan Water District supplies — building a deal with the Imperial Irrigation District for Colorado River water, constructing the $1 billion Carlsbad desalination plant, raising the San Vicente Dam. These were genuine investments in drought security, and they have largely delivered. San Diego was insulated from the worst of recent Colorado River cutbacks because of those investments.

The problem is that those investments were sized against demand projections that turned out to be wildly wrong. Water demand across San Diego fell by 40 percent between 2010 and today, driven by conservation mandates, the turf-rebate program, and behavioral shifts that nobody predicted would be so durable. The Water Authority's budget is roughly 90 percent fixed costs — debt service, infrastructure maintenance, and water purchase contracts that don't shrink when you sell less water. When you sell less water but your costs stay the same, the price per unit goes up. Ratepayers who conserved successfully are now paying more per gallon because they conserved successfully.

Into that already-stressed equation, add the aging dam problem. The city estimates $1 billion in repairs and upgrades are needed across its dam inventory. The flagship project — replacing Lake Hodges Dam with a new roller-compacted concrete structure 100 feet downstream — was estimated in 2024 at $275 million. By August 2025, that estimate had ballooned to between $474 million and $697 million. The county Water Authority, which was expected to share half the cost under existing agreements, announced it would not fund a full replacement. The city is now "re-evaluating options." The state still classifies the dam as unsatisfactory. The water is still being released into the ocean.

The Hodges Ledger (Cumulative, 2023–2026)

Gallons released to ocean: 12+ billion

Replacement water cost (at $1,389/acre-ft): ~$51 million

Lost hydroelectric revenue (annual): $3 million

Hydroelectric maintenance cost (annual, zero output): $3 million

Customer water bill increase attributable to lost local supply: up to 40%

Dam replacement estimate range: $474–$697 million

Original repair estimate ignored for decades: substantially less

The National Infrastructure Report Card Nobody Reads

San Diego and Wahiawa are not outliers on some exotic curve. They are data points on a very crowded graph. The American Society of Civil Engineers, in its 2025 Infrastructure Report Card, gave the nation's dam infrastructure a grade of D+. The average age of a U.S. dam is over 60 years. Nearly 17,000 dams are classified high hazard potential. Of those, more than 2,500 are in poor or unsatisfactory condition. The estimated investment needed between 2024 and 2033 to adequately maintain and upgrade the nation's dams: $185 billion. Amount currently allocated: approximately $20 billion. The gap: $165 billion.

The ASCE's chief engineer for dam infrastructure offered perhaps the most concise summary of the problem: "We are finding deficiencies faster than the dam owners can address the deficiencies." That sentence deserves to be read twice. The inspection apparatus — itself underfunded — is discovering problems at a faster rate than the repair apparatus can close them. The backlog is not shrinking. It is growing.

In California specifically, 42 dams have state-imposed operating restrictions because they cannot safely hold a full reservoir. Together, those restrictions have eliminated 330,000 acre-feet of storage capacity statewide — equivalent to the annual water needs of 3.6 million people. That is not future risk. That is present, ongoing, compounding loss — water that falls as rain and flows to the ocean instead of remaining behind dams to supply cities, farms, and hydropower plants, because the dams that were supposed to hold it are too old and too poorly maintained to be trusted.

The federal government's 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) included approximately $3 billion for dam safety programs — a meaningful down payment on a much larger problem. Congress subsequently redirected $364 million of that funding for other purposes. California, facing a $37.9 billion budget shortfall, cut its own dam repair grant program by $50 million in 2024 even as the program's first solicitation cycle had barely launched. The Dam Safety and Climate Resilience Local Assistance Program's 2024 solicitation was cancelled entirely, with a revised solicitation now expected in 2026.

The Oroville Warning That Wasn't Heeded

None of this should have been new information in 2026. In February 2017, the Oroville Dam — the tallest dam in the United States, on the Feather River north of Sacramento, owned by the California Department of Water Resources — came within hours of catastrophic failure when its primary spillway disintegrated under high outflow and the emergency spillway, which had never been used, began eroding at a rate that threatened to undermine the entire structure. More than 188,000 people were ordered to evacuate. Repairs cost $1.1 billion. The dam had been in service for 49 years.

The independent forensic investigation concluded that the Oroville incident "was the result of a long-term systemic failure to recognize and properly address deficiencies and warning signs." The warning signs had been visible for years. The inspection protocols had not detected them adequately. The regulatory oversight had not compelled the necessary repairs. The owner — the state government itself — had deferred maintenance in the institutional equivalent of the same calculation Dole made at Wahiawa: the cost of the problem was visible, the cost of the repair was certain, and the cost of the failure was borne by someone else.

The difference at Oroville, of course, is that California's government is not a private corporation with a shareholder base in Dublin. There are no dividends flowing upward while the spillway crumbles. The failure at Oroville was institutional — organizational inertia, regulatory complacency, and the diffuse accountability that comes with bureaucratic ownership. The failure at Wahiawa is more focused: a private company with a documented decision-making trail made a documented financial choice, and regulators with formal authority to compel a different choice chose instead to negotiate, extend deadlines, and ultimately offer to buy the problem away with public money.

The Perverse Incentive Machine

What connects Wahiawa, Lake Hodges, Oroville, and the other 2,500 high-hazard dams in poor condition across the United States is not incompetence, though there is plenty of that. It is structure. The institutional arrangements governing water infrastructure in the United States create powerful incentives to defer, delay, and ultimately pass the bill forward in time and outward onto parties who have limited ability to refuse it.

Private dam owners — like Dole — operate within a regulatory system where the fines for non-compliance are trivially small relative to the cost of compliance. A $20,000 fine for seventeen years of safety deficiencies at a dam holding 3 billion gallons above a populated coastline is not regulation. It is a suggestion. The liability for a catastrophic failure is theoretically enormous, but it manifests only if the dam actually fails, the failure is attributed to the owner's negligence, and litigation proceeds to completion — a chain of events that takes many years and can be contested at every link. In the meantime, every year of deferral is a year of savings on the balance sheet.

Public dam owners — like the City of San Diego — operate within a different but equally perverse structure. Capital expenditures for infrastructure repair compete with every other public priority in the budget process. The people who bear the cost of deferred maintenance (ratepayers, downstream communities) are diffuse and largely unorganized. The people who benefit from not spending the money (elected officials who avoid rate increases) are concentrated and directly accountable to voters. The time horizon of the political cycle — two to four years — is fundamentally mismatched with the time horizon of infrastructure decay — decades. Every elected official who avoids a rate increase today is transferring a larger cost to whoever holds office when the dam finally fails or the repair can no longer be deferred.

San Diego ratepayers are currently paying the compounded interest on decades of that political calculation. The $1 billion dam repair bill did not materialize overnight. It accumulated incrementally, year by year, as each annual budget cycle prioritized something more visible and more politically immediate than maintaining a structure that most voters couldn't locate on a map. The water being dumped into the Pacific is the tangible proof of that accumulation.

What Climate Change Does to This Equation

The arithmetic gets worse. California's water infrastructure was designed for a climate that no longer fully exists. The "probable maximum flood" calculations used to size spillways and set operating rules were derived from historical rainfall records. Those records are now being systematically revised upward as atmospheric rivers — the concentrated moisture corridors responsible for most of California's flood events — intensify in a warming Pacific. The Oroville incident in 2017 was partly triggered by an atmospheric river sequence that, while not extraordinary in total precipitation, combined with an unusually warm pulse that melted a deep existing snowpack, generating inflows the dam's managers had not anticipated from a storm of that apparent intensity.

The Wahiawa near-disaster was triggered by a second Kona low arriving on ground already saturated by a nearly identical storm the previous week — a "compounding events" pattern that climate scientists project will become more frequent as baseline ocean temperatures rise. Hawaii's regulatory standard for dam spillway capacity is based on a "probable maximum flood" calculation. The state and Dole had been arguing for years about what that standard actually required — a dispute that was never resolved because the acquisition process created an incentive for everyone to defer to the transfer.

When infrastructure designed for yesterday's climate is maintained at yesterday's funding levels while facing tomorrow's precipitation extremes, the gap between design capacity and actual demand widens every year. The structures don't get older at a fixed rate. The storms that test them get more severe. The intersection of those two curves is not a policy discussion for a future generation. It is the present situation.

The Accountability Gap

The legal and political accountability for the Wahiawa situation remains, as of this writing, unresolved. The Hawaii DLNR Board's acquisition vote — the act that would transfer ownership from Dole to the state and formally absolve Dole of further repair obligations — is scheduled for March 27, 2026, one week after the near-disaster. If approved, and if the deed is recorded before the June 30, 2026 statutory deadline, the state acquires a structurally deficient dam, $26 million in public funds to repair it, and legal possession of a problem that should never have been allowed to reach this point. Dole escapes with its dividends intact.

If the dam had failed before the transfer, the legal exposure would have been extraordinary. The Ka Loko Dam precedent — in which the owner of a Kauai dam whose 2006 failure killed seven people was eventually sentenced to prison after his company pleaded no contest to seven counts of manslaughter — establishes that dam owners in Hawaii face personal criminal liability for failures attributable to negligent maintenance. The difference between Ka Loko and Wahiawa is that Ka Loko's deficiency was a covert act of obstruction. Wahiawa's deficiency is seventeen years of documented public record. Any criminal investigation would not have needed to reconstruct what Dole knew. It would have needed only to read the DLNR's own files.

For San Diego, the accountability gap is less dramatic but equally real. Two water districts have filed civil claims against the city for breach of contract. Ratepayers facing a 61 percent rate increase through 2029 have no direct legal recourse against the officials who deferred the maintenance that created the problem. The diffuse nature of the harm — spread across millions of utility bills — makes collective action difficult even as the individual burden is genuine. The low-income household paying $240 a month for water in one of America's most expensive water markets is paying, in part, for a dam that wasn't maintained and a policy apparatus that couldn't force the issue.

What It Would Have Taken

The genuinely maddening aspect of both situations is how cheap prevention was relative to the cost of the problem it failed to prevent. Twenty-one million dollars would have brought the Wahiawa spillway into compliance. That sum is less than a quarter of what Dole's parent paid in dividends in the same period. The probable cost of a failure — civil damages for 865 flooded properties, wrongful death claims, environmental remediation for three billion gallons of contaminated flood water across the North Shore, destruction of the global surfing industry's most iconic coastline — would have dwarfed $21 million by orders of magnitude.

In San Diego, the compounding costs of inaction — $51 million in discarded water, $6 million annually in lost and wasted hydroelectric revenue, litigation costs from water district lawsuits, the ballooning dam replacement estimate that grew from $275 million to $697 million in less than two years — already substantially exceed what an adequately funded maintenance program would have cost over the same period.

This is the signature logic of deferred maintenance: it is always cheaper to avoid, always more expensive to address, and always easier to defer than to fund. The political economy of infrastructure creates systematic pressure toward deferral. The physical reality of infrastructure creates systematic pressure toward eventual failure. The question is only which comes first — a functioning accountability mechanism, or the failure itself.

On the North Shore of Oahu this March, the answer was closer than it has ever been.

The Dole Corporate Chain

Who Actually Owns Wahiawa Dam

• LocalDole Food Company Hawaii — dam owner of record
• U.S.Dole Food Company Inc. — North Carolina intermediate parent
• ParentDole plc — Irish-domiciled multinational, NYSE: DOLE, HQ: Dublin
• Revenue$8.48B (FY2024)
• Dividends$92.4M paid 2023–2026 (SEC filings)
• Repair cost$21M — never funded

Ireland's effective corporate tax rate for multinationals: 2.2–4.5% on routed profits. Dole plc's Irish domicile complicates enforcement of U.S. judgments against the parent, but its NYSE listing and U.S. subsidiary registrations create domestic jurisdiction hooks under Mallory v. Norfolk Southern (2023).

San Diego's Dam Problem By the Numbers

11 Dams, 1 Fiscal Disaster

• Average age92 years
• Rated "extremely high hazard"9 of 11
• Below-standard condition6 of 11
• Under state restriction4 of 11
• Capacity lost to restrictions20%
• Water dumped to ocean12B+ gallons
• Replacement water cost$1,389/acre-ft
• Est. total repair cost~$1 billion
• Hodges replacement range$474M–$697M
• Rate increase through 2029+61%

The National Picture

ASCE 2025 Dam Infrastructure Report Card: D+

Average U.S. dam age: 64 years. High-hazard potential dams: 16,746. Of those in poor or unsatisfactory condition: 2,522.

Investment needed 2024–2033: $185 billion. Allocated: $20 billion. Gap: $165 billion.

Congress redirected $364 million of the IIJA's $3 billion dam safety allocation to other purposes. California cut its own dam repair grant program by $50 million in 2024. The 2024 solicitation was cancelled; a new one is expected in 2026.

The Legal Precedent

Ka Loko Dam, Kauai — 2006

When the privately-owned Ka Loko Dam failed in March 2006, releasing ~400 million gallons and killing seven people, owner James Pflueger was indicted on seven counts of manslaughter. His company pleaded no contest to all seven counts. Pflueger served seven months in prison.

The Wahiawa Reservoir holds nearly eight times the water Ka Loko did. The paper trail of documented regulatory warnings at Wahiawa is more extensive than anything investigators had to reconstruct in the Ka Loko case.

size=3 width="100%" align=center>

Verified Sources & Formal Citations

1.     Becker, Rachel. "These 42 California dams need repairs. But lawmakers cut the funds in half." CalMatters, June 25, 2024. https://calmatters.org/environment/water/2024/06/california-dams-repairs-budget-cuts-newsom/

2.     Garrick, David. "Hopes for a Lake Hodges Dam replacement dim, despite safety concerns." San Diego Union-Tribune, August 14, 2025. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/08/14/hopes-for-a-lake-hodges-dam-replacement-dim-despite-safety-concerns/

3.     "San Diego to spend $100M to figure out how to fix its aging, vulnerable dams." San Diego Union-Tribune, July 8, 2024. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2024/07/08/san-diego-to-spend-100m-to-figure-out-how-to-fix-its-aging-vulnerable-dams/

4.     "Water districts sue City of San Diego over Lake Hodges dam maintenance." CBS 8 San Diego, 2024. https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/water-districts-sue-city-of-san-diego-over-lake-hodges-dam/

5.     "5.5 Billion Gallons of Water Released from Lake Hodges Dam in Two Years." CBS 8 San Diego, December 20, 2024. https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/55-billion-gallons-released-lake-hodges-dam-two-years/

6.     "Viewers react to San Diego releasing 11 billion gallons of water from Lake Hodges." CBS 8 San Diego, 2023. https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/local/city-of-san-diego-releasing-11-billion-gallons-of-water-from-lake-hodges/

7.     Elmer, MacKenzie. "Rising Water Costs in San Diego Is a Never-Ending Story." Voice of San Diego, December 20, 2024. https://voiceofsandiego.org/2024/12/20/rising-water-costs-in-san-diego-is-a-never-ending-story/

8.     "Why the cost of water in San Diego has blown past L.A." San Diego Union-Tribune, February 17, 2022. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/story/2022-02-12/water-cost-san-diego

9.     San Diego County Water Authority. "Rates & Affordability — 2026 Rate Update." July 2025. https://www.sdcwa.org/your-water/affordability/

10. San Diego County Water Authority. "Water Authority Adopts 2023 Rates and Charges." July 2022. https://www.sdcwa.org/water-authority-adopts-2023-rates-and-charges/

11. City of San Diego Public Utilities Dept. "FY2026 Water Rate Study Report." December 2024. https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/san-diego-fy-2026-water-rate-study-report.pdf

12. Lovell, Blaze et al. "'We're Screwed': Dole Did Little To Fix Dangerous Wahiawā Dam." Honolulu Civil Beat [Investigative Report], March 20, 2026. https://www.civilbeat.org/2026/03/were-screwed-dole-did-little-to-fix-dangerous-wahiawa-dam/

13. Associated Press / NPR. "Over 5,500 told to evacuate flooding in Hawaii as officials warn that dam could fail." March 20, 2026. https://www.npr.org/2026/03/20/nx-s1-5755105/hawaii-evacuations-flooding-dam-failure

14. State of Hawaii, DLNR. "Item L-2: Wahiawa Irrigation System Acquisition." Board Agenda Item, 2023. https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/L-2.pdf

15. State of Hawaii Legislature. "SB833 / Act 218, Session Laws of Hawaii 2023." https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2023/bills/SB833_.htm

16. DLNR Board Submittals. "03/27/26 Meeting Agenda — Item D.6: Wahiawa Irrigation System Acquisition." https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/meetings/blnr-meetings-2026/land-board-submittals-03-27-26/

17. Dole plc. Annual Report and SEC Filings, FY2023–FY2024. CIK 0001857475. https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001857475

18. American Society of Civil Engineers. "2025 Report Card for America's Infrastructure: Dams." https://infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/dams-infrastructure/

19. ASCE 2025 California Infrastructure Report Card. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/state-item/california/

20. California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams. "Dam Safety and Climate Resilience Local Assistance Program (DSCR)." Updated 2025. https://water.ca.gov/Work-With-Us/Grants-And-Loans/Dam-Safety-and-Enhancements-Program

21. California DWR. "Dams Within Jurisdiction of California — Reservoir Restrictions, September 2024." https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website

22. Association of State Dam Safety Officials. "Roadmap to Reducing Dam Safety Risks." 2025. https://damsafety.org/Roadmap

23. ASDSO. "Oroville Dam (California, 2017): Dam Failure Case Study." https://damsafety.org/reference/dam-failure-case-study-oroville-dam-california-2017

24. Scripps Institution of Oceanography. "Researchers Identify Factor Behind 2017 Oroville Dam Spillways Incident." https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/researchers-identify-factor-behind-2017-oroville-dam-spillways-incident

25. Yale Climate Connections. "If a megaflood strikes California, these dams might be at risk." January 31, 2023. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/01/if-a-megaflood-strikes-california-these-dams-might-be-at-risk/

26. Zimmerman, Malia. "Pflueger sentenced in Kauai dam breach tragedy that killed 7 people." Hawaii Reporter, December 17, 2014. https://www.hawaiireporter.com/pflueger-sentenced-in-kauai-dam-breach-tragedy-that-killed-7-people/

27. Environment Hawaii. "Board Talk: Board Pre-Approves Fines to Spur Critical Fixes to Wahiawa Reservoir." https://environment-hawaii.org/?p=14441

28. PPIC. "Priorities for California's Water: Are We Ready for Climate Change?" December 2025. https://www.ppic.org/publication/priorities-for-californias-water/

29. EPA. "Water Affordability Needs Assessment: Report to Congress." December 2024. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-12/water-affordability-needs-assessment.pdf

30. Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC. "Supreme Court Rules U.S. States Have Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations Via Registration: Mallory v. Norfolk Southern." June 2023. https://www.lbkmlaw.com/news-Supreme-Court-jurisdiction-foreign-corporation-due-process.html